← Back to Blog

Anti-Dilution Provisions Explained: Full Ratchet vs Weighted Average

Published April 23, 2026 • 7 min read

Anti-dilution provisions protect investors when a company raises money at a lower valuation than their previous investment—what's called a "down round." While these provisions are standard in venture capital, the type you agree to can dramatically affect founder ownership.

Key Takeaway

Anti-dilution provisions give investors extra shares in a down round to maintain the value of their investment. The two main types—full ratchet and weighted average—have very different impacts on founders.

What Triggers Anti-Dilution?

Anti-dilution kicks in when:

This is called a down round. In a down round, early investors would own a smaller percentage of the company if nothing else changed. Anti-dilution provisions adjust their share count to compensate.

Full Ratchet: The Aggressive Option

Full ratchet is the most investor-friendly (and founder-unfriendly) anti-dilution protection. It recalculates the investor's price as if they had invested at the new, lower price.

⚠️ Watch Out

Full ratchet is extremely punitive to founders. Even a small down round can significantly dilute founder ownership.

Example: You raise $2M at $10/share (200,000 shares). Later, you raise another $2M at $5/share.

ScenarioPrice/ShareShares IssuedInvestor's % After
Round 1 (Series A)$10200,00020% (of 1M shares)
Round 2 (down round)$5400,000

Without anti-dilution: Series A investor now owns 200,000 / 1,400,000 = 14.3%

With full ratchet: Series A investor's $2M is now treated as if bought at $5/share = 400,000 shares. They get an additional 200,000 shares to compensate.

New ownership: Series A = 400,000 / 1,600,000 = 25%

Founders just gave away an extra 10.7% of the company because of full ratchet.

Weighted Average: The Balanced Approach

Weighted average is more balanced. It adjusts the conversion price based on the size of the down round relative to the company's overall capitalization.

New Price = Old Price × [(Old Shares + New Shares) / (Old Shares + (Old Price / New Price) × New Shares)]

Example: Same scenario:

New Price = $10 × [(1,000,000 + 400,000) / (1,000,000 + ($10/$5) × 400,000)]
New Price = $10 × [1,400,000 / 1,800,000] = $10 × 0.78 = $7.78

Series A investor's $2M now converts at $7.78/share = 257,000 shares (vs. 200,000 originally).

New ownership: 257,000 / 1,457,000 = 17.6%

Compared to full ratchet (25%), weighted average is much less severe on founders.

Broad-Based vs Narrow-Based Weighted Average

Within weighted average, there's another distinction:

Broad-based is more founder-friendly because the denominator is larger, resulting in less adjustment. Narrow-based dilutes founders more.

Using our example with broad-based (including 100,000 options):

New Price = $10 × [(1,100,000 + 400,000) / (1,100,000 + ($10/$5) × 400,000)]
New Price = $10 × [1,500,000 / 1,900,000] = $10 × 0.79 = $7.89

The price adjustment is slightly less severe than narrow-based.

Exceptions and Exclusions

Well-negotiated term sheets include exceptions where anti-dilution doesn't apply:

✅ Best Practice

Always negotiate for broad-based weighted average anti-dilution with reasonable exclusions. This protects you from excessive dilution in down rounds while still giving investors fair protection.

Pay-to-Play Provisions

Some term sheets include "pay-to-play" provisions alongside anti-dilution:

This encourages investors to support the company through tough times rather than sitting on the sidelines while their anti-dilution kicks in.

What to Negotiate

  1. Target: Broad-based weighted average with standard exclusions
  2. Acceptable: Narrow-based weighted average (common in early stage)
  3. Negotiate hard: Full ratchet (unless it's a very distressed situation)
  4. Also negotiate:
    • Exclusions for employee equity
    • Exclusions for convertible securities
    • Pay-to-play provisions
    • Basket size (minimum trigger amount)

Real-World Impact

Consider a startup that raises:

With broad-based weighted average, Series A gets a modest adjustment. With full ratchet, Series A's effective purchase price drops dramatically, and founders lose significantly more ownership.

Bottom Line

Anti-dilution provisions are standard, but the type matters. Broad-based weighted average is the industry standard for a reason—it balances investor protection with founder fairness. Full ratchet should be a red flag unless you're in a truly distressed fundraising situation.

💡 Pro Tip

Before signing, run the numbers. Calculate exactly what happens to your ownership under different anti-dilution scenarios. The difference between weighted average and full ratchet can be worth millions in a successful exit.

Model Your Down Round Scenarios

Use our Dilution Calculator to see how different funding rounds and anti-dilution provisions affect your ownership.

Try Dilution Calculator →
Try it yourself

Use our free Equity Dilution Calculator to model your dilution across funding rounds. No signup required.

Try Equity Dilution Calculator Free →
📊

About FounderMath

We build the calculators founders actually need. No spreadsheets, no confusion — just interactive tools that make startup math visual and intuitive. Join 500+ founders who get our weekly equity insights.

Get weekly equity insights

Join 500+ founders who get our weekly breakdown of startup math concepts, real-world equity scenarios, and calculator tips. No spam, ever.