Anti-Dilution Provisions Explained: Full Ratchet vs Weighted Average
Anti-dilution provisions protect investors when a company raises money at a lower valuation than their previous investment—what's called a "down round." While these provisions are standard in venture capital, the type you agree to can dramatically affect founder ownership.
Key Takeaway
Anti-dilution provisions give investors extra shares in a down round to maintain the value of their investment. The two main types—full ratchet and weighted average—have very different impacts on founders.
What Triggers Anti-Dilution?
Anti-dilution kicks in when:
- The company issues new securities (equity, convertible notes, SAFEs)
- The price per share is lower than what the previous investor paid
This is called a down round. In a down round, early investors would own a smaller percentage of the company if nothing else changed. Anti-dilution provisions adjust their share count to compensate.
Full Ratchet: The Aggressive Option
Full ratchet is the most investor-friendly (and founder-unfriendly) anti-dilution protection. It recalculates the investor's price as if they had invested at the new, lower price.
⚠️ Watch Out
Full ratchet is extremely punitive to founders. Even a small down round can significantly dilute founder ownership.
Example: You raise $2M at $10/share (200,000 shares). Later, you raise another $2M at $5/share.
| Scenario | Price/Share | Shares Issued | Investor's % After |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 (Series A) | $10 | 200,000 | 20% (of 1M shares) |
| Round 2 (down round) | $5 | 400,000 | — |
Without anti-dilution: Series A investor now owns 200,000 / 1,400,000 = 14.3%
With full ratchet: Series A investor's $2M is now treated as if bought at $5/share = 400,000 shares. They get an additional 200,000 shares to compensate.
New ownership: Series A = 400,000 / 1,600,000 = 25%
Founders just gave away an extra 10.7% of the company because of full ratchet.
Weighted Average: The Balanced Approach
Weighted average is more balanced. It adjusts the conversion price based on the size of the down round relative to the company's overall capitalization.
Example: Same scenario:
- Old price: $10
- New price: $5
- Old shares (pre-down round): 1,000,000
- New shares issued: 400,000
Series A investor's $2M now converts at $7.78/share = 257,000 shares (vs. 200,000 originally).
New ownership: 257,000 / 1,457,000 = 17.6%
Compared to full ratchet (25%), weighted average is much less severe on founders.
Broad-Based vs Narrow-Based Weighted Average
Within weighted average, there's another distinction:
- Broad-based: Includes all outstanding shares (common, preferred, options, SAFEs)
- Narrow-based: Only includes outstanding preferred shares
Broad-based is more founder-friendly because the denominator is larger, resulting in less adjustment. Narrow-based dilutes founders more.
Using our example with broad-based (including 100,000 options):
The price adjustment is slightly less severe than narrow-based.
Exceptions and Exclusions
Well-negotiated term sheets include exceptions where anti-dilution doesn't apply:
- Issuances to employees, advisors, consultants (option grants)
- Convertible notes/SAFEs that convert in the round (if structured correctly)
- Founder shares issued as part of compensation
- Strategic partnerships where equity is issued at a discount for non-cash consideration
✅ Best Practice
Always negotiate for broad-based weighted average anti-dilution with reasonable exclusions. This protects you from excessive dilution in down rounds while still giving investors fair protection.
Pay-to-Play Provisions
Some term sheets include "pay-to-play" provisions alongside anti-dilution:
- Investors who participate in the down round keep full anti-dilution protection
- Investors who skip the down round lose some or all of their anti-dilution rights
This encourages investors to support the company through tough times rather than sitting on the sidelines while their anti-dilution kicks in.
What to Negotiate
- Target: Broad-based weighted average with standard exclusions
- Acceptable: Narrow-based weighted average (common in early stage)
- Negotiate hard: Full ratchet (unless it's a very distressed situation)
- Also negotiate:
- Exclusions for employee equity
- Exclusions for convertible securities
- Pay-to-play provisions
- Basket size (minimum trigger amount)
Real-World Impact
Consider a startup that raises:
- Seed: $2M at $10M pre-money
- Series A: $8M at $40M pre-money (up round, no issue)
- Series B: $5M at $30M pre-money (down round!)
With broad-based weighted average, Series A gets a modest adjustment. With full ratchet, Series A's effective purchase price drops dramatically, and founders lose significantly more ownership.
Bottom Line
Anti-dilution provisions are standard, but the type matters. Broad-based weighted average is the industry standard for a reason—it balances investor protection with founder fairness. Full ratchet should be a red flag unless you're in a truly distressed fundraising situation.
💡 Pro Tip
Before signing, run the numbers. Calculate exactly what happens to your ownership under different anti-dilution scenarios. The difference between weighted average and full ratchet can be worth millions in a successful exit.
Model Your Down Round Scenarios
Use our Dilution Calculator to see how different funding rounds and anti-dilution provisions affect your ownership.
Try Dilution Calculator →Use our free Equity Dilution Calculator to model your dilution across funding rounds. No signup required.
Try Equity Dilution Calculator Free →